Hostinger vs Bluehost: Which One is Better For Your Needs?

Discovering the appropriate web hosting provider can have a substantial influence on your online presence and the success of your business. In this comparison between Hostinger and Bluehost, I’ll thoroughly evaluate their essential features. We’ll delve into pricing, user-friendliness, performance, security, and customer support – all critical aspects for determining the superior provider.

Both hosting companies enjoy immense popularity and continually enhance their services to stay competitive. If you’ve ever encountered a post seeking advice on choosing between these two providers, you’ve likely sifted through countless comments, each loaded with its own set of pros and cons. The rivalry between these providers can seem unending.

However, I propose a more efficient solution until the next service update arrives. Instead of sifting through endless debates, why not rely on a comprehensive analysis that highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each? That’s precisely what I’ve done. So, dive into my Bluehost vs. Hostinger comparison to discover which one is the perfect match for your website.

General Info About Hostinger And Bluehost

Hostinger and Bluehost are both reputable hosting providers, but they cater to different preferences and needs. Bluehost, with its long-standing history, specializes in WordPress and business-oriented features, yet it may not be as performance-focused. On the other hand, Hostinger is renowned for its cost-effective solutions and impressive performance.

They do have some things in common, but they’re more different than alike. If you’re in a hurry, just skip to the end for the final verdict.

Price Comparison

Hostinger costs less than Bluehost, starting at $1.79/month for shared hosting, while Bluehost begins at $2.75/month. Hostinger also offers cheaper VPS hosting, starting at $5.39/month, in contrast to Bluehost, which is pricier.

Both companies primarily focus on shared hosting, a suitable choice for small to medium-sized websites. They provide free SSL certificates, a free domain, and email accounts with their basic plans. However, their offerings diverge from this point:

Hosting Type	Hostinger	Bluehost
Shared Hosting	✔️	✔️
WordPress Hosting	✔️	✔️
VPS Hosting	✔️	✔️
Dedicated Hosting	❌	✔️
Cloud Hosting	✔️	❌
WooCommerce Hosting	❌	✔️
cPanel Hosting	✔️	❌
CyberPanel Hosting	✔️	❌
Minecraft Hosting	✔️	❌

• Hostinger’s Shared Premium ($1.79/month) includes 100 websites and email accounts, 100GB SSD storage, and allows 25k monthly visits.
• Bluehost’s Basic ($2.75/month) offers hosting for one website, 50GB SSD storage, unlimited bandwidth, and email accounts.

Hostinger is transparent about bandwidth limits, whereas Bluehost keeps things vague by using the term “unlimited.” On the other hand, Bluehost allows an unlimited number of email accounts, while Hostinger permits up to 100, which should suffice for most users.

In terms of storage space, both providers are generous, with Hostinger allowing more than one website even on its cheapest plan, unlike Bluehost.

It’s essential to note that the advertised prices usually require choosing the longest billing term and may increase upon renewal. However, prepaying for Hostinger remains more affordable, especially for a 4-year plan. In contrast, Bluehost’s pricing is relatively higher for shorter-term commitments.

Ultimately, the best value depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

Hostinger offers 2 shared hosting and 1 cloud hosting plan, with prices ranging from $1.79/month to $8.99/month. The cheapest Premium plan at $1.79/mo is great for most users, allowing you to host up to 100 websites with 100GB storage and a free domain. If your websites stay relatively small, you might never need to upgrade. For larger business sites, consider the Business or Cloud Startup plans.

For the best value with Hostinger, choose the Premium plan with a 48-month pre-payment at $124.32, which will renew at $287.52, still cheaper than Bluehost’s cheapest plan.

Bluehost offers 4 shared hosting plans priced between $2.75 and $13.95 monthly, with each plan offering more resources and features. The cheapest plan is decent but somewhat limiting. The Plus plan allows unlimited websites, while the Choice Plus plan adds extra security features for just $1 more, but only for the first billing term. Renewal prices differ significantly.

For good long-term value, choose Bluehost’s Plus plan, costing $178.20 for the first 3 years and renewing at $431.64 for the next 3 years.

Overall, Hostinger is the more budget-friendly option, offering lower prices, especially on renewals, while providing similar features. The rest of this Hostinger vs. Bluehost comparison will delve deeper into their offerings.

Hosting Management: User-Friendly Experience

Having explored both Hostinger and Bluehost, I’ve observed that they both offer a user-friendly hosting management experience. Each provider boasts its own intuitive dashboard designed with beginners in mind. However, it’s worth noting that Bluehost incorporates cPanel, while Hostinger has developed its unique control panel called hPanel, which is just as user-friendly and efficient.

Indeed, Hostinger and Bluehost share many similarities when it comes to ease of use. Still, their respective dashboards and control panels have unique features that are worth discussing separately.

Hostinger’s Account Management Dashboard

Hostinger presents users with a straightforward and functional dashboard, providing access to all the necessary tools for website creation and management. Although Bluehost’s dashboard is also user-friendly, I found it to be more feature-rich compared to Hostinger’s.

Here we have Hostinger’s dashboard, which is remarkably simple. What sets it apart is its clean, clutter-free design, combined with seamless access to various tools and a wealth of information. It embodies the “less is more” philosophy.

Upon your initial login, Hostinger’s dashboard is used for setting up your hosting account, including tasks like WordPress installation, SSL activation, and domain registration finalization. Subsequently, it serves as a hub for navigating your account, leading you to the primary control panel or domain management section.

Bluehost’s dashboard provides access to management tools, suggested setup actions, and helpful guidelines for website setup. Bluehost’s dashboard functions more like a control panel than a navigation area. Users can manage critical aspects here, such as WordPress installation, website management, SSL installation, domain and subdomain additions, and access to paid email accounts.

For those who require more advanced tools, the Advanced button in Bluehost’s dashboard grants access to cPanel.

Here I found both Hostinger’s and Bluehost’s dashboards to be user-friendly, with straightforward navigation.

Control Panel Comparison: Simplified Hosting Management

When we dive into the realm of control panels, we find that Bluehost has opted for the familiar cPanel, while Hostinger took a distinct approach by developing its own hPanel. HPanel draws inspiration from cPanel but focuses on providing a user-friendly experience, especially for beginners. Not that cPanel is overly complicated to use, but hPanel takes simplicity a step further.

Hostinger’s hPanel serves as the central hub for all primary website and hosting management tasks. Here, you can effortlessly install additional WordPress instances or any other content management systems, add domains, create subdomains, access the file manager, and more. The key differentiator compared to Bluehost is that Hostinger uses the control panel for both basic and advanced management tasks.

hPanel boasts a clean and functional design, making it a breeze to navigate and locate the necessary tools. Drawing inspiration from cPanel, it follows a logical tool categorization, grouping them under headings like Email, Software, Security, and more.

Additionally, Hostinger has introduced a dedicated WordPress management area within this dashboard. This area provides convenient access to the WordPress admin panel, allows you to activate “maintenance” mode, manage caching, and perform bulk plugin updates.

In summary, Hostinger’s control panel is exceptionally straightforward, functional, and tailored to beginners’ needs.

Bluehost’s cPanel may seem more familiar to many users, even though it sports a design aligned with the provider’s branding. It provides access to advanced hosting settings, including the file manager, phpMyAdmin for database management, and free webmail client control.

Bluehost has made several modifications to its cPanel, effectively integrating it into its management area. For instance, it decided to move standard cPanel one-click installations for WordPress and other apps out of cPanel. To perform such actions, users are directed to My Sites or the Marketplace. Domain management is no longer found in cPanel either, as Bluehost introduced its dedicated tool for these tasks within the Domains section.

With these adjustments, cPanel essentially transforms into an advanced tool. It’s not that it’s difficult to use, but many users may not frequently require its features. Beginner users might not even need to venture into this section.

It’s important to emphasize that both Hostinger and Bluehost have worked diligently to ensure user-friendly interfaces that facilitate navigation. In the end, it’s a win-win situation – whichever one you choose, you’ll find an easy-to-use interface. Nevertheless, in my view, Hostinger emerges as the winner in this category. The reason? Hostinger invested in developing its own control panel with beginners in mind, earning it an A+ for its efforts.

Hostinger vs Bluehost: A Speed Showdown

When we pit Hostinger against Bluehost in the arena of performance, Hostinger emerges as the clear victor. It flaunts superior speed, handles a heavier traffic load, and boasts a more impressive uptime record compared to Bluehost. In fact, Hostinger’s performance metrics rank among the best in the industry, while Bluehost falls into the “average” category.

Uptime and Response Time

I conducted a meticulous analysis of Hostinger’s and Bluehost’s uptime and response time over a span of approximately 2 months to assess their reliability.

Hostinger delivered an impressive uptime, with zero outages during the observed period, resulting in a remarkable 99.9% uptime. This is undoubtedly a stellar outcome, although it’s essential to acknowledge that achieving 100% uptime over the long term is virtually impossible, as servers require maintenance. The results we’ve seen likely reflect an exceptionally stable period, with more accurate long-term data unfolding over the course of a year or so.

Regarding response time, Hostinger performed decently, averaging a response time of 511ms. The speed was generally consistent, with only occasional minor peaks.

Over the same duration, Bluehost experienced eight outages and a total of 12 minutes of downtime. This translates to a still commendable “None” uptime. This result is more realistic and aligns with the expectations of shared hosting. Bluehost exhibited a notably lower average response time of 359ms. However, it should be noted that Bluehost’s response time displayed some fluctuations, with initial peaks reaching 550ms or even 750ms before stabilizing around 350ms.

Both providers demonstrated reliability, which is the paramount consideration in this context.

Website Speed To evaluate how quickly these providers load websites, I conducted tests using similar websites. Hostinger outperformed Bluehost by more than two-fold.

Speed testing encompasses three critical aspects:

1. Largest Contentful Paint: This metric reveals how swiftly the most substantial portion of a website’s content loads. Achieving this within 2.5 seconds is considered a commendable result.
2. Time to First Byte (TTFB): This parameter gauges how rapidly the server responds initially. It can help determine whether any slowness is attributable to the hosting provider or the website’s theme if the page loads slowly.
3. Fully Loaded Time: This indicates when the website is entirely ready for users to interact with, encompassing both visuals and functionality.
   
   

Hostinger excelled in all of these facets. Its Largest Contentful Paint clocked in at a mere 856ms, leaving no room for doubt about its swift performance. The server exhibited rapid initial response, with TTFB registering at 211ms, a testament to the server’s speed. Even the Fully Loaded Time displayed only a slight delay from the Largest Contentful Paint, loading in just 942ms. It’s a remarkable accomplishment, considering how rare it is to find fully built websites loading in less than a second.

Bluehost, on the other hand, fell behind significantly in this speed comparison. Its Largest Contentful Paint took 1.7 seconds, meeting the benchmark but leaving room for improvement when compared to Hostinger. The reason becomes apparent when we scrutinize Bluehost’s Time to First Byte (TTFB), which was notably slower, coming in at 1 second. However, there was no further delay in reaching Fully Loaded Time, which matched the Largest Contentful Paint at 1.9 seconds. Bluehost still delivered a swift page load time.

The discrepancy in performance can be attributed to the providers’ respective approaches. Hostinger maintains a keen focus on performance, incorporating an array of speed optimizations on its servers, such as utilizing the LiteSpeed webserver with pre-configured caching and offering the latest PHP versions. Furthermore, Hostinger provides the flexibility to select from eight different data center locations worldwide, allowing users to optimize speed for audiences in specific regions.

Conversely, Bluehost relies on tried-and-true technology without aggressively adopting the latest innovations. Consequently, its caching is relatively basic, and PHP version updates are less frequent. Moreover, Bluehost’s servers are exclusively located in the United States, which may not be ideal for audiences situated in Europe or Asia.

Both providers deliver commendable speed results. However, Hostinger maintains a notable advantage in terms of speed, making it the preferred choice for those seeking swifter performance.

Website Security: Hostinger vs. Bluehost

In the realm of website security, both Hostinger and Bluehost include fundamental security features within their plans, but neither goes the extra mile in this domain. For advanced security enhancements, you’ll need to explore additional paid options.

Here’s what you can expect in terms of security from both providers:

1. Free Let’s Encrypt Certificate Installation and Upgrades
2. Easy One-Click Cloudflare Installation
3. Basic Spam Protection
4. Server-Level Security Enhancements

To discern variances between the two providers, you must delve into more advanced security attributes.

Hostinger demonstrates transparency in its approach to backups, offering weekly backups as standard. Moreover, if you opt for the Business plan, these weekly backups are elevated to daily backups.

Conversely, Bluehost’s stance on backups is less clear. Although its Terms of Service (TOS) state that backups are performed, there’s no explicit information regarding the timing of these backups or the feasibility of restoration. The storage location of these backups also remains undisclosed.

For clarity in this regard, you’d need to invest in a third-party security tool, available at an additional cost of $1.99 per month when included with your plan. The Pro plan, however, does include free backups powered by CodeGuard.

While neither Hostinger nor Bluehost emerges as a standout in the realm of security, Hostinger garners additional praise for providing complimentary weekly or daily backups. Beyond this aspect, the two providers maintain a relatively similar security posture.

Stress Testing: Hostinger vs. Bluehost

To evaluate the performance of these websites under heavy visitor traffic, I conducted a stress test by deploying 70 Virtual Users (bots). This test exerts substantial pressure on the servers, revealing any potential issues providers may encounter.

Hostinger effortlessly withstood the test. To interpret the results, focus on the blue line, representing speed, and the grey line indicating the bots. The blue speed line remained consistently stable even as the number of visitors increased. Only a few minor fluctuations appeared later on, but nothing significant enough to suggest a problem.

In contrast, Bluehost struggled to manage the 48 visitors in this test. The first threshold Bluehost passed was with 15 visitors, but the blue speed line exhibited fluctuations that corresponded to the rising number of visitors. This indicates a slight slowdown.

This discrepancy highlights that Hostinger’s servers outperform those of Bluehost. However, it’s essential not to dismiss Bluehost prematurely.

Seventy Virtual Users (70VUs) represent the maximum capacity we believe shared hosting providers can reliably handle, particularly on more expensive plans. Fifteen Virtual Users (15VUs) could easily translate to accommodating 10,000 to 20,000 monthly visitors, indicating a reasonably popular website.

While Hostinger excels, making its competitors appear less impressive, Bluehost delivers commendable performance within its category.

Hostinger here takes the lead in nearly every performance aspect of this comparison, boasting 100% uptime, rapid page loading, and robust servers. In contrast, Bluehost achieves relatively average results.

Customer Support Comparison: Hostinger vs. Bluehost

When it comes to seeking assistance, both Hostinger and Bluehost offer 24/7 customer support through live chat and email. Additionally, Bluehost provides phone support. Both providers maintain extensive knowledge bases, packed with tutorials and documentation to aid users.

To determine which provider offers the most effective support, I presented the same issue to both, a query regarding the setup of a third-party SSL certificate.

My experience with Hostinger was generally positive, although there was a slight delay in response, typically taking up to an hour. In this particular case, I waited around 20 minutes for a response. However, once the agent joined the chat, it took her just a few minutes to provide comprehensive answers.

She demonstrated a deep understanding of the matter and explained it in detail. Importantly, she didn’t pressure me to purchase SSL certificates from Hostinger, even though this option was available. Hostinger’s support is characterized by its honesty and helpfulness, prioritizing an excellent user experience.

In contrast, Bluehost’s response time was impressively swift, with an agent connecting within seconds. However, the answers provided were not as clear.

Overall, in the realm of customer support, Hostinger delivers commendable assistance, emphasizing clarity and customer experience. While Bluehost’s response time is rapid, it falls short in terms of providing clear and concise answers.

Final Verdict: Hostinger vs. Bluehost

Final Verdict: Hostinger vs. Bluehost

In the Hostinger vs. Bluehost showdown, Hostinger emerges as the clear winner in nearly every crucial aspect. It offers a more affordable, faster, and more robust hosting solution compared to Bluehost, which, while still commendable, lags slightly behind with its handy website management tools and prompt customer support.

Let’s break down the comparison:

• Pricing: Hostinger receives full marks here. Their prices kick off at just $1.79 per month, whereas Bluehost’s cheapest plan begins at $2.75 per month. When considering renewal costs, Hostinger remains over two times more budget-friendly.
• Ease of Use: Both providers offer user-friendly interfaces, with Hostinger leaning toward simplicity. In contrast, Bluehost provides additional helpful tools like staging, catering to more advanced users.
• Performance: Hostinger excels in this category, dominating every performance test. It proves to be more dependable, faster, and more powerful than Bluehost.
• Security: The two providers are evenly matched in terms of security. Hostinger gains an edge by including weekly backups with every plan.
• Support: Hostinger’s support may entail longer wait times, but its agents demonstrate greater expertise. On the other hand, Bluehost boasts swift response times with friendly agents, albeit occasional miscommunications.
  
  

Feature	Hostinger	Bluehost	Winner
Pricing	★★★★★	★★★★☆	Hostinger
Performance	★★★★★	★★★★☆	Hostinger
Ease of use	★★★★★	★★★★★	Tie
Support	★★★★★	★★★★☆	Hostinger
Security	★★★★☆	★★★☆☆	Hostinger

Taking all these factors into account, the conclusion is clear: Hostinger offers superior value compared to Bluehost. It’s the go-to choice for most websites, particularly those operating on tight budgets.

I have used and tested both Hostinger and Bluehost but for the last five years I have been using Hostinger only and I am more than happy with that.

Must Read: Start a blog in 2024 and make money from it.